can i fork it?
open sourceGPL-2.0+Local★ 32active aug 2026

digiKam

Excellent local photo cataloging, metadata, tags, duplicates, RAW handling, and basic edits; elegance was not in the requirements.

Technical Profile & Specs

verified 2026-08-10

Cost
$0 / forever (Open Source)
License
GPL-2.0+
Hosting Model
Local (on your machine)
Platforms
desktopone-click install
Installation
Install the Windows installer/portable build, macOS package, or a Linux AppImage, Flatpak, Snap, or distribution package
Operational Setup
First-run collection and database choices are technical, and scanning a large library plus downloading recognition models can take a long time
Where Your Data Lives
Photos remain in selected local or network collection folders; catalog, thumbnails, faces, and similarity data live in SQLite by default or MariaDB, with metadata and ratings optionally written into files or XMP sidecars
The Catch / Trade-off
Its catalog is excellent, but its RAW-development, masking, and polished color workflow are substantially weaker than Lightroom's.

Replaces 4 paid apps

up to $61.49/mo ($738/yr) in subscriptions

digiKam FAQ

Common questions

Is digiKam free and open source?+

digiKam is an open-source tool licensed under GPL-2.0+ that runs on local. Excellent local photo cataloging, metadata, tags, duplicates, RAW handling, and basic edits; elegance was not in the requirements.

What paid software does digiKam replace?+

digiKam serves as a free replacement for 4 paid SaaS applications: Adobe Lightroom, Aftershoot, Capture One, ON1 Photo RAW, saving up to $61.49/month ($738/year) in subscription bills.

How do you install and set up digiKam?+

Installation: Install the Windows installer/portable build, macOS package, or a Linux AppImage, Flatpak, Snap, or distribution package. Setup notes: First-run collection and database choices are technical, and scanning a large library plus downloading recognition models can take a long time

What is the catch or trade-off with digiKam?+

Its catalog is excellent, but its RAW-development, masking, and polished color workflow are substantially weaker than Lightroom's.