can i fork it?
open sourceAGPL-3.0Local or hosted★ 62active aug 2026

FreeLingo

A Duolingo-shaped course runner with CEFR lessons, voice exercises and spaced review; self-hosting is the price of unlimited use.

Technical Profile & Specs

verified 2026-08-10

Cost
$0 / forever (Open Source)
License
AGPL-3.0
Hosting Model
Local or hosted (your machine or their cloud)
Platforms
webself-hostedself-host, real ops
Installation
Use the hosted service, or run Docker Compose with PostgreSQL 16, Redis 7 and the configured AI/speech services
Operational Setup
Self-hosting needs Docker plus an Ollama model or API keys; production voice also needs HTTPS, WebSocket proxying and either GPU-backed local models or paid APIs
Where Your Data Lives
Self-hosted data in PostgreSQL, transient state in Redis, and generated/cached MP3 files; managed accounts live in FreeLingo's cloud
The Catch / Trade-off
FreeLingo's course quality, gamification, social features and editorial maturity are far behind Duolingo, while serious self-hosted voice practice requires substantial infrastructure.

Replaces 1 paid app

up to $12.99/mo ($156/yr) in subscriptions

FreeLingo FAQ

Common questions

Is FreeLingo free and open source?+

FreeLingo is an open-source tool licensed under AGPL-3.0 that runs on local or hosted. A Duolingo-shaped course runner with CEFR lessons, voice exercises and spaced review; self-hosting is the price of unlimited use.

What paid software does FreeLingo replace?+

FreeLingo serves as a free replacement for 1 paid SaaS application: Duolingo Super, saving up to $12.99/month ($156/year) in subscription bills.

How do you install and set up FreeLingo?+

Installation: Use the hosted service, or run Docker Compose with PostgreSQL 16, Redis 7 and the configured AI/speech services. Setup notes: Self-hosting needs Docker plus an Ollama model or API keys; production voice also needs HTTPS, WebSocket proxying and either GPU-backed local models or paid APIs

What is the catch or trade-off with FreeLingo?+

FreeLingo's course quality, gamification, social features and editorial maturity are far behind Duolingo, while serious self-hosted voice practice requires substantial infrastructure.