Head-to-Head Comparison · Alternative to Mode · 📊 analytics
Mode vs Teable
Open-source platform combining powerful database capabilities with a user-friendly spreadsheet interface for efficient data management and collaboration. Here is how Teable ($0/mo open source) stacks up against Mode ($35/mo) across cost, hosting, data privacy, and real-world trade-offs.
Teable is a verified AGPL-3.0-licensed open-source replacement for Mode. Switching from Mode ($35/mo) saves $420/yr per solo seat, or $2,100/yr for a 5-person team. Deployment: Runs on Self-host.
The catch: Teable is an Airtable-like database rather than a project execution suite, so dependencies, portfolio reporting, and resource management are substantially weaker.
Mode vs Teable Specifications
facts verified 2026-11-07
| Dimension | Mode (Paid) | Teable (Replacement) |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Price | $35 / mo | $0 / mo |
| 1-Year Cost (1 seat) | $420 / yr | $0 / yr (Save $420) |
| 1-Year Cost (5 seats) | $2,100 / yr | $0 / yr (Save $2,100) |
| 1-Year Cost (10 seats) | $4,200 / yr | $0 / yr (Save $4,200) |
| Source & License | Proprietary SaaS | open source AGPL-3.0 |
| Where It Runs | Vendor Cloud | Self-host (your server) |
| Platforms | Web / Cloud | webself-hosteddocker to self-host |
| GitHub Stars | — | ★ 22k (active nov 2026) |
Deep Dive: Switching from Mode to Teable
Trade-offs, installation & data architecture
What you trade away
Teable is an Airtable-like database rather than a project execution suite, so dependencies, portfolio reporting, and resource management are substantially weaker.
How to deploy Teable
Hosted signup, or Docker Compose/Kubernetes for self-hosting
What it takes to run
Self-hosting needs Docker, at least 4 GB RAM, PostgreSQL, secrets, storage, and a public URL; the full AI/App Builder stack is materially heavier than the standalone deployment
Where your data lives
Cloud records live in Teable Cloud; self-hosted records live in PostgreSQL, with attachments in local, MinIO, S3, or Aliyun object storage; bases export as .tea backups and tables as CSV
Why fork Teable instead of vibe-coding a Mode clone?
Instead of paying recurring SaaS fees for Mode or rebuilding it from scratch, deploy one of the 5 battle-tested open-source alternatives like Redash.
Mode vs Teable FAQ
Is Teable a good free alternative to Mode?+
Yes. Teable is a verified open-source (AGPL-3.0) replacement for Mode. Open-source platform combining powerful database capabilities with a user-friendly spreadsheet interface for efficient data management and collaboration.
What is the catch when switching from Mode to Teable?+
Teable is an Airtable-like database rather than a project execution suite, so dependencies, portfolio reporting, and resource management are substantially weaker.
How much do you save switching from Mode to Teable?+
Mode costs $35/mo ($420/yr) per seat, whereas Teable is $0/mo. Switching saves $420/yr for a solo user, $2,100/yr for a 5-person team, and $4,200/yr for a 10-person team.
How do I install or self-host Teable instead of Mode?+
Install: Hosted signup, or Docker Compose/Kubernetes for self-hosting. Setup: Self-hosting needs Docker, at least 4 GB RAM, PostgreSQL, secrets, storage, and a public URL; the full AI/App Builder stack is materially heavier than the standalone deployment
