Head-to-Head Comparison · Alternative to UserVoice · 🛠️ dev tools
UserVoice vs Quackback
Collect, prioritize and act on user feedback. Public boards, roadmaps and changelogs show users what you're planning and what has shipped. Here is how Quackback ($0/mo open source) stacks up against UserVoice ($25/mo) across cost, hosting, data privacy, and real-world trade-offs.
Quackback is a verified Open Source-licensed open-source replacement for UserVoice. Switching from UserVoice ($25/mo) saves $300/yr per solo seat, or $1,500/yr for a 5-person team. Deployment: Runs on Self-host.
The catch: Quackback implements posts, votes, duplicate merging, roadmap, and changelog, but it is younger, self-host-only, and far less proven in integrations, moderation, analytics, and support than Canny.
Quackback
$0.00/mo · Open Source
UserVoice vs Quackback Specifications
facts verified 2026-11-07
| Dimension | UserVoice (Paid) | Quackback (Replacement) |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Price | $25 / mo | $0 / mo |
| 1-Year Cost (1 seat) | $300 / yr | $0 / yr (Save $300) |
| 1-Year Cost (5 seats) | $1,500 / yr | $0 / yr (Save $1,500) |
| 1-Year Cost (10 seats) | $3,000 / yr | $0 / yr (Save $3,000) |
| Source & License | Proprietary SaaS | open source Open Source |
| Where It Runs | Vendor Cloud | Self-host (your server) |
| Platforms | Web / Cloud | mobilewebself-hosteddocker to self-host |
| GitHub Stars | — | ★ 344 (active nov 2026) |
Deep Dive: Switching from UserVoice to Quackback
Trade-offs, installation & data architecture
What you trade away
Quackback implements posts, votes, duplicate merging, roadmap, and changelog, but it is younger, self-host-only, and far less proven in integrations, moderation, analytics, and support than Canny.
How to deploy Quackback
Docker Compose
What it takes to run
A non-expert must supply environment secrets, run and update Docker Compose, expose the service behind HTTPS, configure email, and back up its database.
Where your data lives
Feedback posts, votes, comments, users, roadmap items, and changelog entries live in the deployment's PostgreSQL database; uploaded assets and generated files remain in the Docker-hosted storage configured by the deployment.
Why fork Quackback instead of vibe-coding a UserVoice clone?
Instead of paying recurring SaaS fees for UserVoice or rebuilding it from scratch, deploy one of the 7 battle-tested open-source alternatives like Fider.
UserVoice vs Quackback FAQ
Is Quackback a good free alternative to UserVoice?+
Yes. Quackback is a verified open-source (Open Source) replacement for UserVoice. Collect, prioritize and act on user feedback. Public boards, roadmaps and changelogs show users what you're planning and what has shipped.
What is the catch when switching from UserVoice to Quackback?+
Quackback implements posts, votes, duplicate merging, roadmap, and changelog, but it is younger, self-host-only, and far less proven in integrations, moderation, analytics, and support than Canny.
How much do you save switching from UserVoice to Quackback?+
UserVoice costs $25/mo ($300/yr) per seat, whereas Quackback is $0/mo. Switching saves $300/yr for a solo user, $1,500/yr for a 5-person team, and $3,000/yr for a 10-person team.
How do I install or self-host Quackback instead of UserVoice?+
Install: Docker Compose. Setup: A non-expert must supply environment secrets, run and update Docker Compose, expose the service behind HTTPS, configure email, and back up its database.
